Valid Names Results
Porphyrophora Brandt in Brandt & Ratzeburg, 1833 (
Margarodidae)
Nomenclatural History
- Coccionella
Hahnemann
1793: 193.
.
junior synonym
(discovered by Jakubs1965: 5)
Notes: See discussion in Morrison & Morrison (1966) and Remarks below.
- Porphyrophora
Brandt in Brandt & Ratzeburg
1833: 355.
Type species: Porphyrophora frischii Brandt, 1833
by subsequent designation
Kirkal1906a:254
.
(= Margarodes polonicus, (Linnaeus) )
accepted valid name
- Porphirophora
Targioni Tozzetti
1867: 18;.
.
misspelling of genus name
- Pyrophora
Lindinger
1935: 141;.
.
misspelling of genus name
- Pyrophora
Lindinger
1954: 615;.
.
misspelling of genus name
- Cocccionella
Lindinger
1958: 371;.
.
misspelling of genus name
- Coccionella
Ben-Dov
2005a: 83.
.
subsequent use
Notes: Regarded as nomen oblitum
- Porphyrophora
Ben-Dov
2005a: 83.
.
subsequent use
Notes: Regarded as nomen protectum
- phyrophora
Moghaddam
2009: 34;.
.
misspelling of genus name
Notes: Misspelling of phyrophora for Porphyrophora.
Remarks
- Systematics: Lindinger (1954: 614) was first to discover that Hahnemann (1793) used the name Coccionella polonica for the Polish cochineal scale. Consequently, Lindinger (1954) presented the case for acceptance, while using the name Coccionella as a total replacement for Margarodes Guilding, 1829. Morrison & Morrison (1966) noted that, in recent years, there has been sufficient work to demonstrate that Margarodes sensu lato is a complex of morphologically diverse species that can be placed into several distinct genera. Therefore, Coccionella, if accepted, can only replace Porphyrophora Brandt, 1833. Lindinger's (1954) suggestion was not accepted, and no species have been assigned to Coccionella since 1954. On the other hand, numerous new species have been described after 1954 in the genus Porphyrophora. Jakubski (1965: 5) regarded Coccionella as a nomen oblitum and synonymized it with Porphyrophora. The interpretation in this Database basically concurs with that of Jakubski (1965). Article 23.9 (Reversal of Precedence) of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Fourth Edition, 1999) can be applied, and stabilize Porphyrophora Brandt, 1833, as a nomen protectum, while regarding Coccionella Hahnemann, 1793 as a nomen oblitum and a synonym.
Gavrilov-Zimin, 2018, redefined the tribe Margarodini within the family Margarodidae to include the tribes of Dimargarodini, Porphyrophorini, Eumargarodini, Neomargarodini, Tremitoccoccini, Eurhizococcini and Margarodesiini. He did so to place the genus Porphyrophora in relation to other genera that he felt belonged in a subfamily of Margardinae (Dimargarodes, Eumargarodes, Heteromargarodes, Margarodes, Margarodesia, Neomargarodes, Porphyrophora and Termitococcus)
The adult female of Porphyrophora differs mainly from Margarodes in the absence of abdominal spiracles, or their presence only on first two abdominal segments.
- General Remarks: Definition and characters by Signoret (1876a), Borchsenius (1950b), Danzig (1980b), Kosztarab & Kozar (1988F), Foldi (2005a) and by Vahedi & Hodgson (2007).
Keys
- Watson2022: pp.308
(
Adult (F)
)
[Margarodidae in continental Africa]
- VahediHo2007: pp.31-34
(
Adult (F)
)
[Species of Palearctic region]
- Foldi2005a: pp.121
(
Adult (F)
)
[genera of Margarodidae]
- Vahedi2002: pp.277-278
(
Adult (F)
)
[Genera of hypogaeic margarodids]
- Vahedi2002: pp.279-287
(
Adult (F)
)
[Species of Porphyrophora]
- TangHa1995: pp.27
(
Adult (F)
)
[Margarodidae]
- TangHa1995: pp.47-48
(
Adult (F)
)
[Species of Palearctic region]
- KosztaKo1988F: pp.47
(
Adult (F)
)
[central Europe]
- MatesoJa1988: pp.754-755
(
Adult (F)
)
[Species of Kazakhstan]
- Danzig1980b: pp.86
(
Adult (F)
)
[Genera of Far East Russia ]
- KosztaKo1978: pp.16
(
Adult (F)
)
[Hungary]
- Borchs1950b: pp.32
(
Adult (F)
)
[Genera of USSR]
Associated References
- BenDov2005a:
catalog, taxonomy, pp. 83-84
- Borchs1949b:
taxonomy, pp. 334
- Borchs1950b:
taxonomy, pp. 32, 37
- BrandtRa1833:
description, taxonomy, pp. 355-356
- Burmei1835:
description, taxonomy, pp. 77
- Cocker1902q:
taxonomy, pp. 257-258
- Danzig1972a:
taxonomy, pp. 269
- Danzig1980b:
description, taxonomy, pp. 86, 99-100
- Fernal1903b:
pp. 28-30
- Foldi2001a:
taxonomy, pp. 213
- Foldi2005a:
description, illustration, taxonomy, pp. 111-113
- Gavril2018:
illustration, pp. 142
- Goux1948b:
taxonomy, pp. 184-185
- Hahnem1793:
taxonomy, pp. 193
- HodgsoFo2006:
taxonomy, pp. 88
- Jakubs1965:
description, taxonomy, pp. 5-8
- Jashen1999c:
host, taxonomy, pp. 162-163
- KosztaKo1978:
description, taxonomy, pp. 19
- KosztaKo1988F:
description, taxonomy, pp. 47, 51
- Lindin1935:
taxonomy, pp. 141
- Lindin1937:
taxonomy, pp. 193
- Lindin1943b:
taxonomy, pp. 222
- Lindin1954:
taxonomy, pp. 614-615
- Maskel1887a:
taxonomy, pp. 91
- MatesoJa1988:
taxonomy, pp. 754-755
- MkrtchSa2001:
structure, taxonomy, pp. 167-168
- Moghad2009:
taxonomy, pp. 34
- Morris1928:
taxonomy, pp. 5, 73, 220
- MorrisMo1966:
taxonomy, pp. 40, 160
- PicardBa1939:
distribution, economic importance, taxonomy, pp. 118-120
- Signor1876a:
description, taxonomy, pp. 377-380
- Silves1938:
description, taxonomy, pp. 35-36
- Tang2000a:
description, taxonomy, pp. 6-13
- TangHa1995:
description, taxonomy, pp. 43-48
- Tao1999:
taxonomy, pp. 6
- Targio1867:
taxonomy, pp. 18
- Targio1868:
taxonomy, pp. 723
- Vahedi2008a:
life history, taxonomy, pp. 73
- VahediHo2007:
description, taxonomy, pp. 23-122
- Watson2022:
key, pp. 308,314
- Willia2007b:
taxonomy, pp. 449-450
- WilliaBeMa2009:
taxonomy, pp. 159
- Zahrad1959a:
taxonomy, pp. 534
50 Species
