Valid Names Results
Cryptokermes Hempel, 1900 (
Monophlebidae)
Nomenclatural History
- Cryptokermes
Hempel
1900a: 380398.
Type species: Cryptokermes brasiliensis Hempel
by original designation
.
accepted valid name
Remarks
- Systematics: Morrison (1928) distinguished the adult female of this genus, and related genera (Ultracoelostoma, Paracoelostoma, Mimosicerya and Cryptokermes, mainly in possessing reduced antennae. He also noted that the anal tube of the preadult females was often retained within that of the adult, which may suggest that they are pupillarial. (Foldi & Gullan, 2014)
Gavrilov-Zimin, 2018, resurrected the tribe Cryptokermesini within the family Margarodidae to place the genus Cryptokermes in relation to other genera that he felt belonged in a subfamily of Callipappinae (Cryptokermes, Mimosicerya, Paracoelostoma and Ultracoelostoma)
- General Remarks: Definition and characters by Ferris (1918a) and by Morrison (1928).
Keys
- Foldi2020: pp.157
(
Adult (F)
)
[genera of Cryptokermesini]
- Gavril2018: pp.139
(
Adult (F)
)
[Genera of Cryptokermesini]
- Foldi2009: pp.26-27
(
)
[Genera of Coelostomidiidae in Neotrpical region]
- Morris1928: pp.96-97
(
Immature (F)
)
[Margarodidae]
Associated References
- BenDov2005a:
catalog, taxonomy, pp. 30-31
- Ferris1918a:
description, taxonomy, pp. 221-222
- Foldi2001a:
taxonomy, pp. 199
- Foldi2009:
taxonomy, pp. 26-27
- FoldiGu2014:
description, distribution, host, illustration, phylogenetics, structure, taxonomy, pp. 11, 12-20
- Gavril2018:
biology, diagnosis, illustration, key, taxonomy, pp. 136-137
- GullanSj2001:
taxonomy, pp. 257-278
- Hempel1900a:
description, taxonomy, pp. 380, 398-399
- MacGil1921:
description, taxonomy, pp. 87
- Morris1928:
description, taxonomy, pp. 96-97, 100-108, 219
- MorrisMo1966:
taxonomy, pp. 50
2 Species
