Valid Names Results
Antecerococcus indicus (Maskell, 1897) (Cerococcidae: Antecerococcus)Nomenclatural History
- Eriococcus paradoxus indica Maskell 1897: 318. Type data: INDIA: Uttar Pradesh, Saharanpur, on Helicteres isora. Syntypes, female, by subsequent designation Type depository: Auckland: New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Landcare Research, New Zealand; London: The Natural History Museum, England, UK; accepted valid name Notes: Lambdin & Kosztarab (1977a) state that topotype material was examined. Lectotype adf (designated in Hodgson & Williams, 2016). USNM: data as for for holotype but with indica crossed out and with ‘Maskell coll. No.’ WMM’]: 1/1 paralectotype adf (g—paper envelope for slide also with ‘Maskell No. 508’ (relabelled C. paradoxus by Lambdin but Hodgson & Willliams state that this is a mistake).
- Cerococcus hibisci Green 1908a: 19. Type data: INDIA: Maharashtra, Bombay, on Hibiscus sp.; Bengal, Pusa, on Gossypium, by H.M. Lefroy. Syntypes, female, Type depository: London: The Natural History Museum, England, UK; junior synonym (discovered by LambdiKo1977a, 120). Illustr.
- Cerococcus indicus Green, 1910; Green 1910: 5. change of combination and rank Notes: This species was transferred from Eriococcidae to the Cerococcidae.
- Ceriococcus hibisci; Mahdihassan 1946a: 197. misspelling of genus name
- Phenacobryum indicus (Green, 1910); Borchsenius 1960d: 111. change of combination
- Antecerococcus indicus (Green, 1910); Hodgson & Williams 2016: 58-62. change of combination
- Antecerococus indicus (Green, 1910); Watson 2021: 521. misspelling of species epithet
Common Names
- spiny brown coccid Ghosh1940
- yellow cotton scale Ramakr1930
- yellow scale Ali1982
- Escama cerosa espinosa amarilla LambdiWa2022
Ecological Associates
Hosts:
Families: 11 | Genera: 19
- Achariaceae
- Acharia | LambdiKo1977a
- Apocynaceae
- Holarrhena pubescens | LambdiWa2022 | (= Holarrhena antidysenterica)
- Boraginaceae
- Cordia | LambdiKo1977a
- Cochlospermaceae
- Cochlospermum vitifolium | LambdiKo1977a
- Fabaceae
- Cajanus cajan | LambdiKo1977a | (= Cajanus indicus)
- Tephrosia candida | Ramakr1930
- Vachellia nilotica | Ramakr1919 | (= Acacia arabica) (= Acacia nilotica)
- Malvaceae
- Abelmoschus esculentus | LambdiKo1977a | (= Hibiscus esculentus)
- Corchorus | KozarDr1998c
- Corchorus capsularis | LambdiKo1977a
- Gossypium | LambdiKo1977a
- Gossypium herbaceum | LambdiKo1977a
- Grewia biloba | XuHeLi1996
- Helicteres isora | Green1910
- Hibiscus | Green1937 LambdiKo1977a
- Hibiscus cannabinus | LambdiKo1977a
- Hibiscus liliiflorus | LambdiKo1977a
- Hibiscus mutabilis | LambdiKo1977a
- Hibiscus rosa-sinensis | Ramakr1930
- Hibiscus syriacus | AhmadGh1972
- Thespesia populnea | GhaniMu1974
- Myrtaceae
- Psidium guajava | LambdiKo1977a
- Poaceae
- Zea mays | LambdiKo1977a
- Rubiaceae
- Coffea arabica | Lambdi1977a
- Solanaceae
- Solanum melongena | Fletch1919
- Vitaceae
- Vitis | LambdiKo2022
Foes:
Families: 10 | Genera: 26
- Diptera | AhmadGh1972 | (= Muscidea)
- Aphelinidae
- Coccobius reticulatus | AvasthSh1977a | (= Physcus reticulatus)
- Coccophagus | Ali1982
- Eriaphytis orientalis | AvasthSh1977a
- Marietta leopardina | Ali1982 AvasthSh1977a | (= Marietta exitiosa, Marietta javensis)
- Coccinellidae
- Ghanius karachiensis | AhmadGh1972
- Encyrtidae
- Aphycus | AhmadGh1972
- Cheiloneurus latiscapus | AhmadGh1972
- Encyrtus | AhmadGh1972
- Homalotylus ferrierei | AvasthSh1977a
- Lakshaphagus cerococci | XuHeZh1996
- Lakshaphagus fusiscapus | AvasthSh1977a | (= Cheiloneurus fusiscapus)
- Metaphycus cerococci | AvasthSh1977a | (= Euaphycus cerococci )
- Microterys kerrichi | AvasthSh1977
- Neastymachus angustifrons | AvasthSh1977
- Neastymachus cerococci | AvasthSh1977a
- Eulophidae
- Aprostocetus longicorpus | KhanSh1981 | (= Tetrastichus longicorpus)
- Dzhanokmenia kozlovi | AhmadGh1972
- Oomyzus cerococci | KhanSh1981 | (= Syntomosphyrum cerococci)
- Quadrastichus longicorpus | KhanSh1981
- Tetrastichus | AhmadGh1972
- Heliodinidae
- Stathmopoda | Ali1982
- Mycetophagidae
- Berginus | AhmadGh1972
- Noctuidae
- Eublemma | AhmadGh1972
- Eublemma scitula | Ramakr1919
- Pteromalidae
- Cephaleta australiensis | SinhaDi1984
- Cephaleta brunniventris | Ali1982 | (= Anysis alcocki)
- Promuscidea unfasciativentris | AvasthSh1977a
- Scutellista | AvasthSh1977a
- Signiphoridae
- Chartocerus kerrichi | AvasthSh1977a
Associates:
Families: 1 | Genera: 1
- Formicidae
- Camponotus compressus | Ramakr1919
Geographic Distribution
Countries: 17
- Andaman Islands | HodgsoWi2016
- Bangladesh | HodgsoWi2016 Varshn1992
- Burma (=Myanmar) | Fletch1919 Varshn1992
- China
- Shandong (=Shantung) | XuHeLi1996
- Xianggang (=Hong Kong) | LambdiWa2022
- Christmas Island | NeumanODGu2016
- Fiji | TulsyaPr1985
- India
- Andhra Pradesh | Ramakr1930
- Bihar | TulsyaPr1985
- Gujarat | LambdiWa2022
- Jharkhand | LambdiWa2022
- Karnataka | LambdiKo1977a
- Kerala | Ramakr1930
- Madhya Pradesh | LambdiKo1977a
- Maharashtra | Fletch1919
- Odisha (=Orissa) | LambdiWa2022 VarshnMo1987
- Punjab | LambdiWa2022
- Rajasthan | LambdiWa2022
- Tamil Nadu | Ramakr1930
- Tripura | GangulGh1964
- Uttar Pradesh | Green1910
- Uttarakhand | LambdiWa2022
- West Bengal | LambdiKo1977a
- West Bengal | LambdiWa2022
- Japan | LambdiWa2022
- Hokkaido | LambdiWa2022
- Honshu | LambdiWa2022
- Kyushu | LambdiWa2022
- Shikoku | LambdiWa2022
- Kenya | Hargre1948
- Malaysia | Matile1984c
- North Korea | LambdiKo2022
- Oman | HodgsoWi2016
- Pakistan | AhmadGh1972
- Saudi Arabia | Matile1984c
- South Korea | LambdiWa2022
- Sri Lanka | DoAC1923
- Tanzania | Ritchi1936
Keys
- Hodgso2020: pp.170 ( Adult (M) ) [Cerococcidae]
- HodgsoWi2016: pp.20-23 ( Adult (F) ) [Species of Antecerococcus]
- TangHa1995: pp.235 ( Adult (F) ) [Species of Phenacobryum] Key as: Phenacobryum indicum
- HamonKo1979: pp.17 ( First instar ) [Cerococcus first instars] Key as: Cerococcus indicus
- LambdiKo1977a: pp.44 ( Adult (F) ) [Species of Cerococcus] Key as: Cerococcus indicus
Remarks
- Systematics: There are only two type slides of Eriococcus paradoxus indica, each with a single specimen. Both were considered to refer to Cerococcus paradoxus by Lambdin & Kosztarab (1977) and both had labels added to the slide as follows: ‘Cerococcus paradoxus (Maskell) det. Lambdin’, with one being made the lectotype and the other a paralectotype. According to Hodgson & Williams, 2016, they represent A. indicus not A. paradoxus. The designation of one of these specimens as the lectotype by Lambdin & Kosztarab (1977) is therefore revoked. The code states: 74.2. Lectotype found not to have been a syntype. If it is demonstrated that a specimen designated as a lectotype was not a syntype, it loses its status of lectotype. As these slides are clearly not syntype specimens of E. paradoxus, Hodgson & Williams have put a line put through the label referring to them as Cerococcus paradoxus and each has had a further label added to the back of the slide stating that the specimen is now the lectotype/paralectotype of Eriococcus paradoxus indica Maskell. Le Pelley (1968) states that "the numerous references to Cerococcus hibisci Green in Africa are doubtless misidentifications of C. coffeae, a junior synonym of C. theydoni. Cerococcus hibisci Green was synonymised with C. indicus by Lambdin and Kosztarab (1977). Specimens of these two morphs are very easy to separate in most cases and appeared to be separate species, with C. hibisci having no cribriform plates on abdominal segment III and A. indicus always having two groups: a submedial plate on each side of III plus those on segment IV. However, an exhaustive search eventually found populations with both morphs on a single slide. Therefore, Hodgson & Williams, 2016 accepted the synonomy of C. hibisci with E. paradoxus indica. The adult female of A. indicus is characterised by the following combination of character-states: (i) dorsum with three sizes of 8-shaped pores; (ii) large and intermediate-sized 8-shaped pores in fairly dense swirls throughout most of dorsum; (iii) intermediate-sized pores rather elongate, with slightly pointed outer margins; (iv) apex of each stigmatic band with 1–4 small 8-shaped pores; (v) posterior abdominal segments with a band of 9–15 largest 8-shaped pores along each margin; (vi) cribriform plates in a submedial group of 1–3 on each side of abdominal segment IV and (more rarely) 0–2 on each side of segment III; (vii) fleshy setae on dorsal surface of each anal lobe long; (viii) leg stubs large; (ix) posterior stigmatic pore band bifurcated; (x) multilocular disc-pores very few, restricted to submargins of most abdominal segments and also sometimes metathorax; (xi) a few ventral 8-shaped pores present near clypeolabral shield, (xii) median anal plate usually with a slightly serrate apex, and (xiii) antennae possibly with a shallow setal cavity but no cone-like apex. (Hodgson & Williams, 2016) The adult male is the male is similar to that of Cerococcus artemisiae, but differs in: head: (i) lacking small pores on median crest; (ii) ventral mid-cranial ridge present; (iii) presence of a preoccipital ridge; (iv) in having many more ventral head setae, particularly laterad to each ventral eye; (v) absence of a ridge between ventral eyes; (vi) fleshy setae on antennae much shorter than width of antennal segments, and (vii) bristles on antennae reasonably clear. Thorax: (i) legs with many more setae, but trochanter without a long trochanter seta; (ii) with many more tegular setae, and (iii) presence of a pair of hs on membranous area of scutum (the elongate shape of the prescutum might also be another difference, but the damage to the thorax might have modified its shape and that on C. artemisiae was folded and could be much longer than the measurements suggest). Abdomen: (i) presence of glandular pouches and glandular pouch setae, (ii) presence of caudal extensions on segment VIII; (iii) presence of a long ventropleural seta on each caudal extension of abdominal segment VIII; (iv) a greater number of ventral abdominal setae on segment VII; (v) penial sheath rather shorter; (vi) a different distribution of setae on penial sheath, including (vii) absence of short setae laterally on style. A. indicus is more similar to Antecerococcus ornatus, except on the metathorax. (Hodgson, 2020)
- Structure: Female insect is covered by a compact test which varies considerably in color and texture. Some are thickly coated with pinkish tomentum from which many coarse glassy filaments project. Others have a more compact globular test of a dull brown color with a superimposed scurfy covering of yellow secretion. Adult female is broadly pyriform, abdominal segments narrowed and tapering to posterior extremity (Green, 1908a).
- Biology: Antecerococcus indicus is bisexual and has one protracted generation annually, overwintering as eggs protected beneath the female’s protective test. (Lambdin & Watson, 2022) The test of this species consists of a leathery product, insoluble in all fat solvents, quite unlike wax (Mahdihassan, 1946a). Tulsyan & Prasad (1993) state that this species "occurs from March to November."
- Economic Importance: This species is commonly known as the yellow scale of cotton, (however, it is not an important pest of cotton) though isolated plants are often badly covered (Ramakrishna Ayyar, 1930). Ramakrishna (1919) states that this species is a serious pest of Acacia arabica and that young trees severely infested appear white because of the high number of scales.
- General Remarks: Lambdin & Kosztarab (1977a) provide a detailed description and illustration of this species. Hamon & Kosztarab (1979) provide a detailed description and illustration of the first instar. The literature record of Antecerococus indicus from Kenya in Hargreaves (1948) is likely to have been a misidentification (Hodgson & Williams 2016).
Illustrations
Citations
- Ahmad1973: biological control, distribution, host, 449
- AhmadGh1972: biological control, distribution, host, taxonomy, 76
- Ali1967: description, distribution, host, life history, taxonomy, 29-30
- Ali1970a: catalog, distribution, host, taxonomy, 149
- Ali1981: biological control, distribution, host, 97, 98, 99
- Ali1982: biological control, description, distribution, host, 126-130
- Anders1926: distribution, host, 140
- AvasthSh1977a: biological control, distribution, host, taxonomy, 374-376
- BaTe1939: distribution, host, 2
- Balach1932d: distribution, 34
- Borchs1960d: distribution, taxonomy, 111
- ChackoDeRa1978: biological control, host, ill
- ChowdhUl1984: distribution, host, 41
- DeitzTo1980: taxonomy, 26
- DoAC1923: distribution, host, 64
- DoAM1954: distribution, host, 1056
- Fernal1903b: distribution, host, taxonomy, 77
- Fletch1914: distribution, 508
- Fletch1917a: distribution, host, taxonomy, 117-119
- Fletch1919: distribution, host, taxonomy, 287
- Fletch1921: taxonomy, 14
- GangulGh1964: distribution, host, 359
- GhaniMu1974: biological control, distribution, host, taxonomy, 41
- Ghesqu1946a: distribution, taxonomy, 374
- Ghosh1940: chemical control, description, distribution, illustration, 112
- Green1908: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 41
- Green1908a: description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 19
- Green1910: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 5-6
- Green1918: host, 235, 237
- Green1919: host, 265
- Green1922: distribution, host, 465
- Green1937: catalog, description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 287
- HamonKo1979: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 61-64
- Hargre1948: distribution, host, taxonomy, 36
- Hedaye1941: biological control, distribution, host, 16
- Hodgso2020: description of male, diagnosis, illustration, key, taxonomy, 170, 173-176
- HodgsoMi2002IMa: phylogeny, 511
- HodgsoWi2016: description, diagnosis, distribution, host, illustration, key, morphology, structure, taxonomy, 5, 8–9, 10, 23, 25, 58-62, 110, 130, 134, 166
- KhanSh1981: biological control, distribution, host, 346
- Khoo1974: host, illustration, 125
- KondoWa2022a: distribution, host, list, 9
- KosztaVe1966: taxonomy, 374
- KozarDr1998c: catalog, distribution, host, taxonomy, 39-40
- KozarWa1985: catalog, taxonomy, 76
- Lambdi1986a: taxonomy, 371
- LambdiKo1977a: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 120-125
- LambdiWa2022: biology, control, diagnosis, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 382-383
- LePell1932: distribution, 226
- LePell1968: taxonomy, 377
- LiMa1935: distribution, 266
- Lindin1910: taxonomy, 151
- Lindin1958: taxonomy, 366
- Mahdih1933: taxonomy, 562
- Mahdih1946a: behavior, description, distribution, taxonomy, 197
- Mahdih1951: taxonomy, 108-110
- Mahdih1957: ecology, 266-271
- Mahdih1979: description, distribution, taxonomy, 226
- Mani1976: biological control, 62
- Maskel1897: description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 318
- Matile1984c: distribution, host, 220
- Maxwel1908: distribution, host, taxonomy, 122, 135
- MillerGi2000: catalog, taxonomy, 473
- Misra1920: taxonomy, 561
- Misra1924CS: distribution, host, 346
- MorrisMo1927: description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 18-19
- Morsta1936: distribution, 100
- Nangpa1948: distribution, host, taxonomy, 50
- NeumanODGu2016: dispersal, distribution, host, 159-166
- Newste1917b: distribution, host, 127
- Notley1937: host, taxonomy, 114, 133
- ParidaMo1982: chemistry, taxonomy, 19
- Ramakr1919: description, distribution, economic importance, taxonomy, 627
- Ramakr1919a: biological control, distribution, host, 45
- Ramakr1921a: catalog, distribution, host, 341, 342
- Ramakr1924: distribution, host, 344
- Ramakr1926: taxonomy, 452
- Ramakr1930: description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 53
- Ramakr1940: taxonomy, 248-249
- Ritchi1926: taxonomy, 35
- Roba1935: taxonomy, 304
- Ruther1914a: distribution, host, 321
- Sander1909a: catalog, distribution, host, taxonomy, 36
- Sassce1911: distribution, host, taxonomy, 63
- Sassce1913: taxonomy, 106, 107
- ShafeeAlAg1975: biological control, distribution, host, taxonomy, 21, 76, 78
- Shroff1920: distribution, host, 562
- SinhaDi1984: biological control, description, distribution, host, 112
- Sohi1964: distribution, host, 144
- TangHa1995: description, 235, 239-240
- Trench1926: distribution, host, 157
- TulsyaPr1985: distribution, taxonomy, 10-11
- TulsyaPr1993: distribution, host, 10-11
- Varshn1984a: taxonomy, 138, 139
- Varshn1984b: taxonomy, 371
- Varshn1992: distribution, host, taxonomy, 74-75
- VarshnMo1987: distribution, host, 170
- Vayssi1930: taxonomy, 404
- Vayssi1946: taxonomy, 379
- Wang2001: taxonomy, 513, 516
- Wardle1929: distribution, host, 418
- Willia2017a: catalog, list of species, 206
- WilliaWa1990: distribution, 177
- XuHeLi1996: biological control, distribution, host, 304-306
- ZeyaHa1993: biological control, taxonomy,