Valid Names Results
Metadenopsis is now Paratrionymus Borchsenius, 1948 (Pseudococcidae)
Nomenclatural History
- Paratrionymus Borchsenius 1948c: 582. Type species: Ripersia halocharis Kiritshenko by original designation . accepted valid name
- Metadenopsis Matesova 1966: 98. Type species: Metadenopsis halogetonis Matesova by original designation . junior synonym (discovered by DanzigGa2015: 335)
Remarks
- Systematics: Subfamily: Pseudococcinae (Choi & Lee, 2022) In the description of the genus, Paratrionymus, Borchsenius erroneously noted the presence of 3-locular pores and 3 pairs of cerarii in adult females. These mistakes may have provoked Matesova to describe a new genus, Metadenopsis. Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin (2015) compared the type material of the two genera and ascertained that the species are identical except for the presence of a few tubular ducts in M halogetonis and none in Ripersia halocharis. (Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin, 2015)
- General Remarks: Good definition and characters of the adult female given by Borchsenius (1948c, 1949) and by Tang (1992).
Keys
- DongZhWu2017: pp.594-595 ( Adult (F) ) [Pseudococcinae in China]
- DanzigGa2015: pp.323-324 ( Adult (F) ) [genera in Metadenopus (g/g)]
- DanzigGa2013a: pp.215-216 ( Adult (F) ) [Key to Pseudococcidae from Russia and Neighboring Countries] Key as: Metadenopsis
- Tang1992: pp.92 ( Adult (F) ) [China] Key as: Metadenopsis
- Borchs1949: pp.87 ( Adult (F) ) [Palaearctic region] Key as: Metadenopsis
Associated References
- BenDov1994: catalog, pp. 228, 286
- Borchs1948c: description, taxonomy, pp. 582
- Borchs1949: description, taxonomy, pp. 165
- DanzigGa2013a: description, taxonomy, pp. 216, 220
- DanzigGa2015: diagnosis, key, pp. 323, 335-337
- DongZhWu2017: key, pp. 594
- Gavril2007: taxonomy, pp. 1
- Mateso1966: description, taxonomy, pp. 98
- MorrisMo1966: taxonomy, pp. 147
- Tang1992: distribution, host, pp. 97-98, 147