Valid Names Results
Cerochiton ficoides (Green, 1899) (Cerococcidae: Cerochiton)Nomenclatural History
- Cerococcus ficoides Green 1899d: 225. Type data: INDIA: Assam, Duars, on Theaceae, by G. Watt. Lectotype, female, by subsequent designation (LambdiKo1977a,109). Type depository: London: The Natural History Museum, England, UK; accepted valid name Illustr.
- Cerococcus ficoïdes Green, 1899; Balachowsky 1932d: 34. misspelling of species epithet
- Phenacobryum ficoides (Green, 1899); Tang & Hao 1995: 238. change of combination
- Cerochiton ficoides (Green, 1899); Hodgson & Williams 2016: 147-149. change of combination
Common Names
Ecological Associates
Hosts:
Families: 6 | Genera: 6
- Ericaceae
- Rhododendron | Takaha1930
- Euphorbiaceae
- Mallotus japonicus | Ferris1921a | (= Mallotus japonica)
- Malvaceae
- Firmiana simplex | Hua2000
- Moraceae
- Ficus retusa | Takaha1928
- Rubiaceae
- Gardenia jasminoides | LambdiKo1977a Takaha1928 | (= Gardenia florida)
- Theaceae
- Camellia sinensis | Takaha1928 Tao1978 | (= Thea chinensis)
Geographic Distribution
Countries: 2
- India
- Assam | DasGa1961 Green1899d
- West Bengal | Varshn1992
- Taiwan | Takaha1928
Keys
- HodgsoWi2016: pp.144-145 ( Adult (F) ) [Adult females of Cerochiton species]
- Wang2001: pp.514 ( ) [Key to Chinese species of Cerococcus] Key as: Cerococcus ficoides
- TangHa1995: pp.235 ( Adult (F) ) [Species of Phenacobryum] Key as: Phenacobryum ficoides
- Wang1994: pp.248 ( Adult (F) ) [China] Key as: Cerococcus ficoides
- HamonKo1979: pp.14 ( First instar ) [Cerococcus first instars] Key as: Cerococcus ficoides
- LambdiKo1977a: pp.37 ( Adult (F) ) [Species of Cerococcus] Key as: Cerococcus ficoides
Remarks
- Systematics: This species is close to C. kalmiae and is the only species with acorn shaped spiracular setae that does not occur in North or South America (Hamon & Kosztarab, 1979). The adult female of C. ficoides is similar to those of C. bernardi and C. javanensis, sharing with them: (i) stigmatic pore bands with the same structured apex; (ii) fleshy setae associated with each stigmatic pore apex, and (iii) at least two sizes of tubular ducts on the dorsum, the larger present on each side of the lattice-like lines of 8-shaped pores. (Hodgson & Williams, 2016)
- Structure: Female test is subcircular, presenting a budlike appearance on twigs, concave dorsally and brown in color. Adult female is pear shaped (Lambdin & Kosztarab, 1977a). The adult female of C. ficoides is characterised by the following combination of character-states: (i) anteroventral sclerotizations absent; (ii) three finely spinose setae present along inner margin of each anal lobe; (iii) dorsal fleshy setae on anal lobes rather spinose and bullet-shaped; (iv) posteroventral seta on each anal lobe absent; (v) dorsum with three sizes of 8-shaped pore; (vi) smallest 8-shaped pores forming a lace-like pattern throughout dorsum and margins of venter; (vii) largest 8-shaped pores restricted to within and around apices of each stigmatic band; (viii) apex of each stigmatic pore band with round groups of 4–10 sunken 8-shaped pores in centre; (ix) lateral margins of posterior abdominal segments without large 8-shaped pores; (x) cribriform plates represented by a single plate medially on abdominal segment IV (Taiwanese material with a submedial group of 3–7 plates on each side); (xi) stigmatic bands quite long and extending onto dorsum; (xii) tubular ducts of two sizes on dorsum, broadest in a line on either side of each lace-like pattern and medially on posterior abdominal segments; (xiii) leg stubs absent; (xiv) stigmatic pore bands bifurcated; (xv) multilocular disc-pores present on posterior abdominal segments; (xvi) spiracular disc-pores extremely few near spiracles but quite abundant in each stigmatic pore band apex, and (xvii) antennae without either a cone-like apex or setal cavity. (Hodgson & Williams, 2016)
- General Remarks: Detailed description and illustration by Lambdin & Kosztarab (1977a). Hamon & Kosztarab (1979) provide a detailed description and illustration of the first instar. Detailed redescription and illustration in Hodgson & Williams, 2016.
Illustrations
Citations
- Ali1970a: catalog, distribution, host, taxonomy, 149
- Balach1932d: distribution, 34
- DasGa1961: distribution, host, 256
- Fernal1903b: distribution, host, 57
- Ferris1921a: distribution, host, 212
- Green1899d: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 225
- Green1903a: distribution, host, 102
- Green1908: taxonomy, 41
- Green1919: host, 268
- GreenMa1907: taxonomy, 338
- HamonKo1979: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 55-57
- HodgsoWi2016: diagnosis, distribution, host, key, taxonomy, 10, 12, 15, 144, 145, 147-150
- Hua2000: distribution, host, 140
- Lambdi1986a: taxonomy, 371
- LambdiKo1977a: description, distribution, host, illustration, taxonomy, 109-112
- Ramakr1921a: catalog, distribution, host, 342
- Takaha1928: distribution, host, taxonomy, 339
- Takaha1929: distribution, host, taxonomy, 45
- Takaha1930: host, 40
- TangHa1995: description, 235, 238-239
- Tao1978: distribution, host, 78, 79
- Varshn1984a: distribution, 139
- Varshn1992: distribution, host, taxonomy, 74
- Wang1994: description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 248, 250
- Wang2001: description, distribution, host, taxonomy, 513, 514, 518
- WattMa1903: distribution, host, 316
- Willia2017a: catalog, list of species, 206
- WilliaDe2020: taxonomy, 198
- Yang1982: distribution, host, 139