Valid Names Results
Pseudochermes Nitsche, 1895 (
Cryptococcidae)
Nomenclatural History
- Pseudochermes
Nitsche
1895: 1247-1249.
Type species: Chermes fraxini Kaltenbach
by original designation
.
accepted valid name
- Apterococcus
Newstead
1898: 97.
Type species: Ripersia fraxini Newstead
by monotypy and original designation
.
junior synonym
(discovered by Lindin1937: 179, 185)
Remarks
- Systematics: Generic characteristics that distinguish this genus from all other eriococcids are: anal ring crescent shaped; frontal tubercles present; dorsal setae slightly enlarged posteriorly; multilocular pores present on dorsum (Williams, 1985h).
The nearest genus to Pseudochermes seems the Rhopalotococcus Williams, 2007 from New Caledonia by having only one pair of setae on basal segment of labium or basal segment not developed.In Palaearctic Region the Borchseniococcus Kayden and Kozár, 2008 and Hispaniococcus are similar to Pseudochermes by sclerotized and reduced anal ring, not well developed anal lobes, and by the presence of frontal tubercles. Both genera differ by two pairs of setae on the basal segment of the labium. In Kozár, et al., 2013 Pseudochermes was placed in the family Cryptococcidae Kosztarab, 1967.
- Structure: antennae 6 segmented. Frontal tubercle present. Labium 3 segmented. Stylet loop much longer than body. Quinquelocular pores present on both surfaces in small number. Legs well developed.
Keys
- Hodgso2020: pp.19-22
(
Adult (M)
)
[Neococcoid higher taxa]
- Danzig1988: pp.709
(
Adult (F)
)
[Pseudochermes species of far East USSR]
- Willia1985h: pp.352
(
Adult (F)
)
[Key to genera of British Eriococcidae]
Associated References
- BoratyWi1964:
taxonomy, pp. 92
- Borchs1937:
taxonomy, pp. 40, 58
- Borchs1949:
taxonomy, pp. 43, 322, 365
- Cocker1899a:
taxonomy, pp. 392
- Cocker1899m:
taxonomy, pp. 278
- Danzig1964:
taxonomy, pp. 632, 634
- Danzig1980b:
taxonomy, pp. 231
- Danzig1986:
description, taxonomy, pp. 269
- Danzig1988:
taxonomy, pp. 707, 709
- Fernal1903b:
taxonomy, pp. 114
- Ferris1921b:
taxonomy, pp. 60
- Ferris1922b:
taxonomy, pp. 246
- Ferris1937:
taxonomy, pp. 5
- Ferris1955a:
taxonomy, pp. 178
- Ferris1957c:
distribution, taxonomy, pp. 88
- GomezM1937:
taxonomy, pp. 322, 360
- GomezM1948:
taxonomy, pp. 97
- Green1922:
distribution, pp. 345
- Green1922b:
description, taxonomy, pp. 20-21
- Hoy1962:
taxonomy, pp. 13, 201
- Hoy1963:
catalog, taxonomy, pp. 187-188
- JudeicNi1895:
taxonomy, pp. 1247-1249
- Kiritc1940:
taxonomy, pp. 123
- Kohler1998:
catalog, distribution, taxonomy, pp. 394-395
- KosztaKo1978:
taxonomy, pp. 67
- KosztaKo1988F:
distribution, taxonomy, pp. 272
- Koteja1974:
taxonomy, pp. 295
- Koteja1974b:
taxonomy, pp. 78
- KotejaZa1981:
taxonomy, pp. 502
- Kozar2009:
distribution, host, pp. 111
- KozarKaKo2013:
description, distribution, host, taxonomy, pp. 607-609
- KozarKaKo2013:
description, distribution, host, illustration, structure, taxonomy, pp. 608-615
- KozarKo2008a:
description, taxonomy, pp. 247-250
- KozarWa1985:
catalog, distribution, pp. 75
- Lindin1908:
taxonomy, pp. 94
- Lindin1933:
description, taxonomy, pp. 31
- Lindin1937:
taxonomy, pp. 179, 185, 194
- MacGil1921:
taxonomy, pp. 129
- MillerGi2000:
catalog, taxonomy, pp. 443
- MorrisMo1966:
taxonomy, pp. 164
- Newste1898:
taxonomy, pp. 97
- Newste1903:
description, taxonomy, pp. 209-210
- Nitsch1895:
description, taxonomy, pp. 1247-1249
- Schmut1952:
taxonomy, pp. 418
- Sulc1912:
taxonomy, pp. 33
- Terezn1981:
taxonomy, pp. 13, 58
- Willia1985h:
taxonomy, pp. 385-386
- Willia2007a:
structure, pp. 1357
- Zahrad1959a:
taxonomy, pp. 539
3 Species
